COMMENTARY 6/30/04 President George W. Bush's speech to the Turkish people during the NATO Summit on June 30, 2004, in Istanbul, Turkey, was, in my opinion more, fiction than fact. Being of Armenian descent, if I were not aware of the Armenian genocide of 1915-1923 by Turkey's Ottoman predecessors, I would have thought he was announcing the second coming of Christ. It was so greasy that I almost threw up. During his speech, President Bush referred to Turkey as a "secular democracy," with 150 years of democratic reform history behind them. As the Turkish newspaper, Commuriet, later published, President Ahmet Nezdet Serez of Turkey told President Bush after his speech that they are a secular nation in that there is no religious influence in their decisions of State. At no time did he acknowledge that they were a "democracy." As to President Bush's frequent statement that Turkey should serve as a model for the Islamic world, Turkey's President Serez further rebuffed Bush by saying that he found the view "totally unacceptable." President Bush went on to say that Turkey should be accepted into the E. U. (European Union). To which France's President Chirac took the liberty of diplomatically telling him to mind his own business. Here is an American President who acknowledged the genocide of our people while he was campaigning for the 2000 election, yet turning and calling Turkey a "secular democracy" for political advantage. What about your promise to acknowledge the genocide of the Armenians, Mr. President? Or the intermittent slaughtering of Iraqi Kurds--or the ongoing present-day blockade of Armenia by Turkey and Azerbajian? Turkey, a nation which our President Bush feels can be a legitimate model for the Islamic world. Doesn't our President realize that almost every Islamic nation in the Middle East has nothing but loathing for Turkey because of their despotism during WW I. Has the world forgotten about Lawrence of Arabia? Turkey's President Serez told President Bush that Turkey being a model for the Islamic nations was totally unacceptable because he knew how much hate there is for Turkey in the Middle East. What befuddles me is how can a President of the United States of America, the greatest nation on earth, be so ignorant or so ill-advised when it comes to foreign policy? As far as Turkey goes, I have no doubt that there are many people of conscience among them. This was proven many times over during the massacres when Armenians were saved from being massacred by their Turkish neighbors, while facing certain death for doing so. And as far as that goes, I believe that there are many Armenians among us who would be willing to start forgiving if the government of Turkey tried engendering good will instead of trying to sweep their despotic past under their present-day moth-eaten rug of diplomacy. Furthermore, as far as our President Bush goes, they should also realize, as Turkish President Serez and French President Chirac did, that even a U.S. President can unabashedly speak with a `forked tongue'. Joseph Vosbikian